Pre-Launch Review for AI-Built Apps and Websites
AI made it easier to build a first version. It did not make launching safer.
Send us what you built. We will test it before users, investors, or clients find the problems.
Founders, operators, and small teams can now create websites, apps, agents, workflows, dashboards, and internal tools with Cursor, Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, Codex, Claude, ChatGPT, and other AI-assisted tools. That is a real advantage.
The problem usually appears right before launch. The demo works, the homepage feels close enough, and the product looks ready. But nobody has tested what happens when a real user signs up, pays, gets confused, uses a phone, loses connection, submits a form twice, or asks where their data goes.
That is where Underlabs helps
Underlabs reviews AI-built apps, websites, agents, and workflows before they are shown to users, investors, partners, or clients. We inspect the parts that usually break quietly: authentication, payments, mobile behavior, accessibility, privacy, analytics, links, errors, deployment, and recovery basics.
This is not agency theatre. It is a practical launch inspection. We are not trying to turn a version 1 into a perfect enterprise platform. We are looking for the issues most likely to hurt trust, block conversion, create support problems, or make the product difficult to operate after launch.
The goal is clarity. You should know what must be fixed before launch, what can wait, what is a real risk, what is only polish, and where the product needs a more serious technical build plan.
AI tools can help you build quickly.
Launch still needs judgment.
Who this is for
This service is for people who moved quickly and now need a serious technical review before launch. You may have built a product with AI tools, hired someone to assemble a site or app quickly, or prepared a working prototype that looks promising but feels fragile.
It is especially useful for founders, small teams, business owners, non-technical founders, operators, and product teams that have working screens but no structured QA process.
Why fast builds break
AI-assisted development often produces software that looks more complete than it really is. Some areas are overbuilt. Others are missing. Some flows work in the happy path but fail when a real user forgets a password, refreshes checkout, opens the site inside a mobile browser, or enters unexpected data.
The issue is not only code quality. It is system quality. A product needs predictable behavior, clear states, recovery paths, analytics, privacy alignment, and enough operational visibility to understand what happened when something goes wrong.
What we inspect
A launch inspection is a practical review from a user, operator, and technical risk perspective. The exact scope depends on the product, because a small marketing site with one form does not need the same inspection as an app with authentication, payments, dashboards, user roles, uploaded files, and third-party integrations.
The point is to inspect what matters for your launch, not to perform a ceremonial checklist.
Core flows
Login and sign-up testing
Password reset and recovery
Main user journey review
Form validation and errors
Broken links and dead ends
Launch risks
Payment flow testing
Mobile responsiveness
Accessibility pass
Privacy-policy mismatch review
Security basics
Operational readiness
Console and network errors
Analytics and tracking check
SEO and sharing previews
Deployment and recovery basics
Optional Codex/Cursor-ready tickets
Audit tiers and engagement options
Starting orientation: $499
A focused pass for a small website, landing page, prototype, or simple AI-built workflow. Useful when you need a fast second opinion before sharing the product with a small audience.
- Broken links
- Main user flow
- Mobile layout
- Basic SEO issues
- Forms and console errors
Starting orientation: $1,500
For products with more moving parts, including authentication, payment flows, onboarding, dashboards, emails, integrations, user-generated content, AI features, or internal admin tools.
- Login and sign-up testing
- Payment flow testing
- Accessibility and mobile review
- Privacy and analytics checks
- Prioritized fix list
Starting orientation: $3,000+
For more serious launches where device behavior matters. Useful for web apps, mobile apps, hybrid apps, dashboards, mobile-first products, and workflows that need testing across real devices and browsers.
- Real-device testing
- Browser differences
- Subscription and payment flows
- App release readiness
- Monitoring and recovery basics
You built a product quickly with AI tools and want a serious pre-launch review. You are preparing to show it to users, investors, partners, or clients. You are worried about auth, payments, mobile behavior, privacy, analytics, or deployment, and you want a prioritized fix list instead of vague feedback.
This is probably not the right service if you only have an idea, need a full penetration test, need legal compliance certification, want a guarantee that the product is secure, or expect every issue to be fixed inside the audit fee.
How this connects to a larger build plan
Sometimes the audit shows that the product is close. A few broken links, weak mobile spacing, missing analytics events, unclear privacy language, and a couple of form bugs may be all that stands between the current version and a controlled launch.
Other times, the audit shows that the visible product is ahead of the underlying system. The screens may look ready, but the backend may not handle roles, permissions, payments, data storage, admin operations, notifications, analytics, or recovery properly.
That does not mean the product is a failure. It means the next step should be a practical build plan. Useful related pages include App MVP Development in Canada, Mobile App Development in Montreal, and App Cost in Canada.
FAQ
Is this only for AI-built apps?
No. The service is designed around AI-built apps, websites, agents, and workflows because those products are now being created quickly by founders and small teams. But the same inspection is useful for any product that was built fast and needs a serious pre-launch review.
Do you fix the problems too?
The audit can be inspection-only, or it can lead into fix work. Some clients only need a prioritized report so their current developer or AI-assisted workflow can handle the fixes. Others want Underlabs to help implement the fixes, prepare tickets, clean up flows, or support the launch.
Is this a penetration test?
No. This is not a full penetration test, security audit, or compliance certification. We review security basics and obvious launch risks, especially around authentication, access, forms, payments, exposed errors, privacy mismatch, and configuration concerns.
Can you review a product built with Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0, Codex, Claude, or ChatGPT?
Yes. Those tools are part of the reason this service exists. They can help people build quickly, but they do not replace structured QA, launch planning, security basics, accessibility review, analytics setup, privacy alignment, or production readiness.
What access do you need?
It depends on the product. For a simple website, we may only need the URL and relevant test instructions. For an app or workflow, we may need test accounts, staging access, payment test mode, admin access, device requirements, expected user flows, and a short explanation of what the product is supposed to do.
Can you prepare tickets for Cursor or Codex?
Yes. When useful, we can turn findings into developer-ready tickets. These can be written so they are easy to give to a developer or use in AI-assisted coding tools such as Cursor or Codex.